Here is
the next installment on “Post Industrial Agriculture”. In this entry, the focus
will be on plant genetics in regard to organic seed saving in a post industrial
fashion.
To
begin, before agriculture became industrialized, seed was saved from a season’s
crops and selected along the lines of the healthiest looking fruit. It was a
simple theory of saving seeds from the best crops and thus, over countless
generations, those crops grew to be what are commonly known as “heirloom”
varieties today. “Heirloom” varieties were almost eradicated over the past
fifty plus years due to industrialized agriculture, although thankfully, some
die-hard farmers and gardeners kept these amazing strains of vegetables and fruits
alive.
Once
industrialized agriculture entered the scene, no longer was the health and the
flavor of a given crop viewed as important. Instead, what was deemed important
was only along industrialized lines; ship-ability; that is, being able to be
shipped long distances without rotting or damage from stacking in crates, etc.,
uniformity in appearance; seemingly correct color and shape; and productivity,
how much can be produced and harvested off of one plant, etc. Flavor, that
which tells our taste buds that a given vegetable is healthy, was deemed
unimportant, just so long as the vegetable “looked” right after being shipped
vast distances and were not noticeably bruised, etc. This is just the start of
how seed saving changed over the decades through industrialized agriculture.
This
particular entry was inspired by an article I read in Acres, USA magazine. The
article appeared in the January 2013 issue, and was titled, “Modern Seed
Movement”. Essentially it was an interview with plant breeder, John Navazio,
co-founder of the Organic Seed Alliance. I was absolutely inspired but what I
read, and following on the heels of Joel Salatin’s situation as described in
“The Omnivore’s Dilemma” by Michael Pollan, it fell neatly into the situation
of Post Industrial Agriculture.
When it
comes to current industrialized agriculture, genetically modified seeds are the
norm. Almost all of the countless fields of corn and soybean across the country
come from genetically modified seed. And almost all of that corn and soybeans
are actually inedible for humans without heavily processing with the use of
lots of chemicals… But I won’t get into that here. How that “food” which is
actually… literally, poison is manufactured, etc. will be dealt with in another
entry.
However,
when it comes to vegetables that consumers purchase in a grocery store, not all
of those originate from genetically modified seed, and it is rather difficult
to discover which ones actually are genetically modified. Some of those
varieties actually start from “real” seeds…
But
let’s get back to the seeds. Putting genetically modified seeds… behind us,
industrialized agriculture seeks those characteristics listed above,
ship-ability, uniformity in appearance, productivity, etc. Taste, flavor is of
no concern. The bottom line from this approach is simply how to make the most
money with the least effort possible. And to continue with the simplistic level
of thought here, genetics, that is, the diversity in genetics which has
everything to do with adaptability is not even an afterthought, but I will
dwell on that a little later.
One
hundred years ago, seeds were saved almost exclusively from “open-pollinated”
plants. This simply means that the plants were “open” to the natural means of
pollination, whether from wind, bees and other insects, or even self-pollinated
as some plants actually reproduce. It takes little thought with this process,
simply let nature do what nature does. And, that little thought is OH SO MUCH
wiser than ANY of industrialized agriculture’s thoughts. But I digress.
The
problem with “open-pollinated” seeds from the industrialized agriculture point
of view is that any gardener or farmer can easily save seeds from those crops,
and then plant their own saved seeds the next year. Where is the money in that?
Hmm? The point, once again, is to make as much money as possible. The answer to
that question is hybridized seeds. A hybrid is the result of taking pollen from
two parent plants and creating a specific offspring that has the traits…
ship-ability, etc. desired by the large seed companies. The resulting plant
will NOT produce seed that reflects the same characteristics. Only by crossing
the two particular parent plants can that offspring actually be developed. These
are also known as F1 plants or hybrids. If a farmer or gardener grows F1
plants, saving seeds from those plants will result in nothing close to the
plant they hoped.
Whenever
I peruse seed catalogs, which for me are often exclusively organic seed
catalogs, I grow extremely frustrated over the vast number of hybrid (F1) seeds
offered. The write up in any given catalog swears by certain traits that are
reliable with the hybrids, but I cannot see beyond the F1 in the name. There
are two things involved here. The first is MONEY. The main aspect behind hybrid
breeding is that the breeder can essentially patent their seeds without
actually obtaining a patent. Only one entity has the two parents and that
entity owns that particular hybrid. The second is that that particular hybrid
is by nature inferior to “open pollinated” varieties, ALTHOUGH, they pronounce
themselves to be just the opposite. The main issue with all of this is that
humans think they can improve on nature, WHICH THEY CANNOT… and that is the
error that has decimated our food situation as it currently stands.
When I
read the Acres, USA article on John Navazio, I was immediately enamored with
the substance of what he had to offer. In essence, this is not incredibly
complex stuff,… but it is COMPLEX in its own right. By comparison to the
industrial agriculture approach, which is essentially producing food stuffs
through poison, resulting in food that is… POISON, Navazio’s approach is from a
straight forward genetic stance that accepts what nature offers and attempts to
steer nature toward traits in produce that would better benefit us.
I will
pause here to state that when it comes to the plant kingdom and seed production
it is extremely versatile and diverse. There is no ONE way plants reproduce,
and as mentioned above, some reproduce through wind, some bees and others
insects, and some can do it on their own. However, in order to attempt to relay
a more “simple” example, I will use the example in the article, which was
zucchini.
Navazio
worked with an organic zucchini farmer who grows a couple of acres of
zucchinis. The variety was Black Eel. Out of the plants he grew only one in
four would produce a quality zucchini, which is often a HUGE disadvantage in
organic farming with open pollinated seeds. Navazio provided a means to help this
situation.
Seed
was saved from the best 26 zucchini plants grown, only instead of tossing all
of those seeds in the same basket, as was the process in our past, the 26
groups of seeds were kept separate. The next year, one row each was planted
from the 26 batches… and the result astounded the grower! Some of the zucchini
were vining squash instead of bushes, some were yellow in color… what the…? The
farmer was exasperated, but Navazio reassured him that that was the point of
the procedure. The point of the procedure was to cull out the bad traits of
that particular zucchini strain and keep the good traits. So, all of the vining
plants were destroyed, along with the yellow or misshapen plants. In all, six
rows were deemed the “best” and those were allowed to cross pollinate and
produce the next season’s seeds. As a result, the ensuing year produced much
more reliable zucchini than any crop previous.
This
may sound rather simple, but the scope is EXTREMELY large. The point presented
by Navazio is that no one outside of organic farming would exert the effort to
improve the natural genetics of an “open pollinated” variety. There is simply
no money in it. Instead, the money invested in plant geneticists is spent on
creating hybrids, which no one else can duplicate… and… equals… MONEY!!!
The
point behind the scientific genetic approach as described by Navazio is a
healthier plant. While certain traits that are unwanted, like yellow zucchini
or vining squash, the remaining plants are still “open pollinated” which
maintains a wide genetic diversity. And this is key. While the large companies
attempt to manipulate nature into producing a particular type of fruit,
Navazio’s approach merely steers it. Instead of limiting the gene pool to the
size of, say, a wading pool, the gene pool remains that of an ocean. As the
climate continues to change rapidly, a farmer has no idea what one season will
do in comparison to another. It could be a cold rainy year. It could be a hot
dry year. By allowing for genetic diversity, the plants are more adaptable to
the varying climate.
This
has been a rather brief description of what is involved in the organic approach
to plant genetics. Each species of plant has a different means of reproduction.
The entire process is EXTREMELY COMPLEX. However, the process of reproduction
is not… so long as we allow nature to do what it has done for countless years! The
point is to work “with” nature and not to attempt to “manipulate” it. There is
a vast chasm of difference here and it all revolves around money.
The
fact is that industrial agriculture is NOT sustainable… and EXTREMELY
destructive to our species’ health, the health of all the other animals on the
planet… and EXTREMELY destructive to the environment from which all life still
clings to… life! If we steer away from the shortsighted and simplistic approach
of industrial agriculture, through true science, we can use our knowledge of
plant genetics, not to modify those genes in some macabre gruesome nature that
leads to a myriad of health ailments, but to allow nature to create plants
that, as food, will better allow our bodies to keep healthy… merely by eating
what nature provides!
Nice article Tom, I enjoyed reading this one. These industrial models never take into account real people. I am so over the industrial chemical revolution. Epic fail.
ReplyDelete